The Role of Red Flags on Fraud Detection: The Public Sector Investigative Auditor’s Perspective

Authors

  • Dhimaz Pratama Putra Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia.
  • Yoremia Lestari Ginting Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/miceb.v7i1.15581

Keywords:

Investigative Auditor, Fraud Detection, Fraud, Red Flags, Public Sector

Abstract

Red flags are early indicators that help auditors detect potential fraud before it develops further. This study aims to understand the role of red flags in detecting fraud from the perspective of auditors at the East Kalimantan Provincial Representative Office of the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP). The study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with in-depth interviews with BPKP investigative auditors. Data analysis was conducted using Miles and Huberman's interactive model through the stages of collection, reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing, with the help of NVivo 15. The results of the study show that auditors interpret red flags as symptoms of unusual behavior or transaction patterns that need to be further investigated. Auditors follow up on red flags with in-depth analysis, additional evidence testing, and coordination with relevant parties. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding and responding quickly to red flags in order to improve the effectiveness of internal controls and prevent state losses, as well as the need for fraud detection guidelines in the public sector. In addition, current literature lacks studies that propose qualitative method on employs red flags and fraud detection in investigative audit type

References

Asriadi, Firman, M., & Lukman, S. (2021). Pengaruh pengetahuan, kemampuan berpikir, analisis tugas, pengalaman, tekanan waktu terhadap pendeteksian kecurangan oleh Inspektorat Kabupaten Pinrang. Indonesian Journal of Bussiness and Management, 7(1), 71–80.

Awaliah, K. N. (2023). Fraud triangle theory: Pendekatan strategis dalam mendeteksi korupsi dan kecurangan pada laporan keuangan publik. Karimah Tauhid, 2(5), 1493–1506.

Awang, N., Hussin, N. S., Razali, F. A., & Abu Talib, S. L. (2020). Fraud triangle theory: Calling for new factors. Insight Journal, 7(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.24191/ij.v7i1.62

Erong, E. A., Abur, M. T., Izzudin, A. Q., Rudeng, R., & Seleman, K. A. (2023). Peran red flag auditor dalam proses identifikasi fraud di perusahaan. Digital Bisnis: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen dan E-Commerce, 2(3), 12–22.

Gizta, A. D. (2020). Pengaruh red flag dan pelatihan terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi fraud dengan skeptisisme profesional sebagai variabel intervening. Cash, 3(2), 11–22.

Masri, I., Murni, Y., Oktrivina, A., & Adhianti, E. M. (2022). Peran red flags terhadap pengaruh skeptisisme profesional, pengalaman kerja, dan beban kerja auditor terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi fraud. Akurasi: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 4(1), 69–82.

Meidiyustiani, R., & Lestari, I. R. (2022). Kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan melalui audit tenure, red flags, time pressure, dan kompetensi auditor. Kindai, 18(3), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.35972/kindai.v18i3.836

Susilawati, D., Utami, T., & Indriani, A. A. (2022). Meninjau skeptisisme profesional auditor, independensi, dan red flags terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan (Studi kasus Inspektorat Kabupaten Ponorogo dan Madiun). Widya Dharma Journal of Business, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.54840/wijob.v1i1.30

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles