Evaluation of The Probebaya Program Governance by The Community Organization in Samarinda City

Abstract

The Probebaya Programme in Samarinda City is implemented through type 4 self-management with Community Groups (Pokmas) as the implementing agency. This study focuses on evaluating four key aspects, namely: activity planning, community participation, human resources, and transparency and accountability in public fund management. The research method used is qualitative, with a case study approach in Sungai Pinang Village, Samarinda City. Data was obtained through in-depth interviews and observations at the research site. The research findings show that (1) Planning: deliberations took place, but socialisation and technical understanding (technical guidelines, budget/schedule preparation) were limited and invitations were not inclusive. (2) Participation: community involvement was dominant in the early stages, but access to implementation or supervision was low. (3) Capacity of Pokmas human resources: technical training is uneven and there is dependence on external parties for budgeting and report writing. (4) Transparency and accountability: budget information and accountability reports are not open to residents, and there is information asymmetry within Pokmas. The implication of this study is the importance of providing equal technical training for all Pokmas members, not just the chairperson or treasurer, and increasing community participation in every stage of the programme. Thus, fund management and accountability can be improved, and more active participation will increase the effectiveness and sustainability of this community-based programme. The recommendation of this study is to strengthen the training system and increase community involvement in the entire programme cycle