Job Flexibility, Job Security, and Job Satisfaction: The Role of Role Conflict among Online Transportation Drivers

Authors

  • Putri Nirmala Sari Stikubank University, Semarang, Indonesia.
  • Anwar Mansyur Stikubank University, Semarang, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/miceb.v7i1.15545

Keywords:

Job Flexibility, Job Security, Job Satisfaction, Role Conflict

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationships between job flexibility, job security, and job satisfaction, as well as the role of role conflict among online transportation drivers in Semarang City, Indonesia. The background of this research stems from large-scale demonstrations involving thousands of online transportation drivers in Central Java, reflecting demands on platform companies for fare regulation, application rental deductions, and legal protection for online transportation drivers as informal workers. This study employed a quantitative method using questionnaire data from 136 respondents. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that job flexibility (β = 0.499, p < 0.001) and job security (β = 0.351, p = 0.001) have significant positive effects on job satisfaction. However, role conflict does not moderate the relationships between job flexibility and job satisfaction (p = 0.302) and between job security and job satisfaction (p = 0.356). These findings indicate that job flexibility and job security are the main determinants of job satisfaction among online transportation drivers, while role conflict neither strengthens nor weakens these relationships. Practically, this study provides implications for online transportation companies to strengthen policies that enhance job flexibility and job security to improve online transportation driver job satisfaction. Theoretically, this research contributes to the literature by enriching the understanding of the relationships among job flexibility, job security, job satisfaction, and role conflict within the context of informal employment in the digital economy era

References

Ali Jadoo, S. A., Aljunid, S. M., Dastan, I., Tawfeeq, R. S., Mustafa, M. A., Ganasegeran, K., & AlDubai, S. A. R. (2015). Job satisfaction and turnover intention among Iraqi doctors - a descriptive cross-sectional multicentre study. Human Resources for Health, 13(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0014-6

Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–Family Conflict and Flexible Work Arrangements: Deconstructing Flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012

Bazzoli, A., & Probst, T. M. (2023). Psychometric properties of the shortened and rescaled versions of the Job Security Index and Job Security Satisfaction scale. Applied Psychology, 72(2), 832–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12397

De Stefano, V. (2015). The Rise of the “Just-in-Time Workforce”: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the “Gig-Economy.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602

GOLDEN, L. (2001). Flexible Work Schedules. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(7), 1157–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121956700

Greenhalgh, L., & Rosenblatt, Z. (1984). Job Insecurity: Toward Conceptual Clarity. The Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 438. https://doi.org/10.2307/258284

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an Extra Day a Week: The Positive Influence of Perceived Job Flexibility on Work and Family Life Balance *. Family Relations, 50(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00049.x

Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., & Miller, B. C. (1996). Work and Family in the Virtual Office: Perceived Influences of Mobile Telework. Family Relations, 45(3), 293. https://doi.org/10.2307/585501

Howcroft, D., & Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. (2019). A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018760136

Ilies, R., Johnson, M. D., Judge, T. A., & Keeney, J. (2011). A within‐individual study of interpersonal conflict as a work stressor: Dispositional and situational moderators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.677

Kässi, O., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056

Kompas.com. (2025, May 20). Hari Ini, 1.500 Driver Ojol Akan Gelar Unjuk Rasa di Semarang, Apa Tuntutannya? Retrieved from regional.kompas.com: https://regional.kompas.com/read/2025/05/20/062000778/hari-ini-1.500-driver-ojol-akan-gelar-unjuk-rasa-di-semarang-apa?utm_source=Various&utm_medium=Referral&utm_campaign=AIML_Widget_Desktop

Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486

Rosenblat, A. (2016). Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers. In International Journal of Communication (Vol. 10). http://ijoc.org.

Tubre, T. C., & Collins, J. M. (2000). Jackson and Schuler (1985) Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Job Performance. Journal of Management, 26(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600104

Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles