Modes of Acquiring Innovation in Smes in the Creative Industry Sector in East Kalimantan

Yuli Fitrianto

Abstract


Small and Medium Enterprises (UKM) creative industry sector in East Kalimantan has the potential to be a source of long-term competitive advantage in the industrial era which has shifted from a natural resource base to a knowledge base. However, SMEs in the creative industry sector and SMEs in general have limited resources and economic scale efficiency for innovation activities. There are four strategy modes for obtaining innovation for SMEs in the creative industry sector in East Kalimantan to be competitive in local, regional and international markets, namely through market-based and non-market innovation acquisition strategy modes. The strategy for obtaining market-based SME innovation is through: 1) internal development, and 2) innovation acquisition. Internal development, namely innovation activities within the SME organization because innovation is valuable, a source of competitive advantage, while the SME's internal resources support it. The innovation acquisition strategy can be carried out by SMEs because internal organizational resources are limited, but entrepreneurs in SMEs need to capture market opportunities in the short term. The capacity of SMEs is often limited to carry out innovation activities, so SMEs can adopt non-market based innovation strategies, such as through: 3) vertical and horizontal alliances, 4) partnerships. SMEs can collaborate with other SMEs, suppliers, buyers and other stakeholders to overcome resource limitations and increase the efficiency of economies of scale in carrying out innovation activities.


Keywords


Innovation acquisition strategy mode; SMEs in the creative industry sector

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. 1987, Innovation, market structure and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71: 567-574.

Ahn, J.M., Minshall, T., Mortara, L. 2015. Open innovation: a new classification and its impact on firm performance in innovative SMEs. Journal of Innovation Management JIM 3(2), 33-54

Audretsch , D. and R. Thurik . 2009 . Linking entrepreneurship to growth. Working Paper, OECD STI , 2081/2.

Bank Indonesia, 2015. Study on Improving Access to Financing for Creative Industries in Indonesia . Collaboration between Bank Indonesia and the World Bank.

ESCAP, 2009, Globalization of production and the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises in Asia and the Pacific: Trends and prospects, Studies in Trade and Investment , No. 65. Bangkok, United Nations.

Frenz, M., Lambert, R., 2012. Mixed Modes of Innovation: An Empiric Approach To Capturing Firms' Innovation Behaviour, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) STI Working Paper 2012/6

Harvie, C, 2004, East Asian SME Capacity Building, Competitiveness and Market Opportunities in a Global Economy, Working Paper 04-16, Department of Economics, University of Wollongong,.

Innosutra. 2007. InnoSupportTransfer –Supporting Innovations in SME.

Kadin Indonesia 2007, Visi 2030 & Roadmap 2010 Industri Nasional. www.kadin- indonesia.or.id

Kim, H., & Park, Y. 2010. The effects of open innovation activity on performance of SMEs: the case of Korea. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3-4), 236-256.

Kolk, A., Van Tulder, R. and Kostwinder, E., 2008. Business and partnerships for development.European Management Journal 26: 262-273.

Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. 2010. Open innovation in SMEs-An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290-300.

Lunati, M., 2010, SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Innovation. OECD Tunis, 29-30 March 2010 4th Meeting of the MENA-OECD WG 2

Moore, L. 2013. Cultural and Creative Industries concept – a historical perspective.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 110; 738 – 746

Narrod, C., Devesh, R., Okello, J., Avendaño, B., Rich, K. and Thorat, A., 2009. Public-privatepartnerships and collective action in high value fruit and vegetable supply chains. Food Policy34: 8-15.

Narula, 1999. In-house R&D, outsourcing or alliances? Some strategic and economic considerations. University of Oslo, and MERIT, Maastricht home page: http://www.bigfoot.com/~r.narula

OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual, 3rd Edition. (2005). Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data . OECD, Eurostat, Paris.

Rivera-Santos, M., Rufín, C. and Kolk, A., 2002. Bridging the institutional divide: partnerships in subsistence markets . Journal of Business Research 65: 1721-1727.

Schumpeter, 1934. Theory of Economic development . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Stewart, Thomas A. 1996. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. McGraw-Hill, 342 Sumpeno et al. , 2017. P3MD Expert Village Innovation Program Acceleration Training Module . Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia

Sudarmanto . 2009, Performance and Development HR Competency . Jakarta: Student Library .

Uhl -Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. 2007. Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era . The leadership quarterly , 18(4), 298-318.

Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation , 29(6), 423-437.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/miceb.v6i1.14245

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 MICEB : Mulawarman International Conference on Economics and Business

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons Licence

Proceeding MICEB  ISSN print: 1907-3011  ISSN online: 2528-1127 is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License.