Email this article Pengaruh ukuran dewan dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kinerja perusahaan pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia
Abstract
Peneltian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pengaruh ukuran dewan, ukuran perusahaan terhadap kinerja. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2012-2016. Sampel penelitian 113 perusahaan sektor industri dasar dan kimia yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2012-2016. Metode pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan purposive sampling. Teknik analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan Statistik Deskriptif dan Regresi Data Panel. Hasil analisis menunjukkan Ukuran Dewan berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan, ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh positif namun tidak signifikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan interaksi antara ukuran dewan dan ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan.
Keywords
References
Agarwal, A. and Knoeber, CR (1996) Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between management and shareholders.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, 377–397.
Bamiatzi, V., Cavusgil, S. T., Jabbour, L., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2014). Does business group affiliation help firms achieve superior performance during industrial downturns? An empirical examination.journal homepage, 23, 195-211.
Daily, C., Dalton, D. and Cannella, A. (2003) Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review 28(3), 371–382.
Dalton, D., Daily, C., Johnson, J. and Ellstrand, A. (1999) Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal 42(6), 674–686.
De Andres, P., Azofra, V. and Lopez, F. (2005) Corporate boards in OECD countries: Size, composition, functioning and effective-ness. Corporate Governance: An International Review 13(2), 197–210.
Denis, DK and McConnell, JJ (2003) International corporate governance.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38(1), 1–36.
Dulewicz, V. and Herbert, P. (2004) Does the composition and practice of boards of directors bear any relationship to the performance of their companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12(3), 263–280.
Elloumi, F. and Gueyie, JP (2001) Financial distress and corporate governance.Corporate governance 1(1), 15–23.
Faccio, M. and Lasfer, MA (1999) Managerial ownership, board structure and firm value: The UK evidence.Cass Business School Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=179008.
Hampel, R. (1998) Committee on corporate governance: Final report. Gee Publishing, London.
Higgs, D. (2003) Review of the effectiveness of non-executive directors. Department of Trade and Industry, London.
Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks.Strategic Management Journal, 9, 31–41.
Jensen, M. (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48, 831–880.
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure.Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–350.
Julianto, Pramdia. (2017). Semester I 2017 Sritex Catatkan Laba Rp 454 Miliar.http://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2017/10/02/230000526/semester-i-2017-sritex-catatkan-laba-rp-454-miliar-. 05-02-2018
O Connell, V. (2010) The relationship between firm performanceand board characteristics in Ireland. European Management Journal (2010) 28, 387– 399.
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro–macro link. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 486–501.
Pye, A. (2000) Changing scenes in, from and outside the board-room: UK corporate governance in practice from 1989 to 1999. Corporate Governance: An International Review 8(4), 335–346.
Rosenstein, S. and Wyatt, JC (1990) Outside directors, board effectiveness and shareholder wealth.Journal of Financial Economics 44, 229–250.
Ruigrok, W., Peck, S. and Keller, P. (2006) Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making; evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies 43(5), 1201–1226.
Scafarto, V.,Ricci, F., Della Corte, G., & De Luca, P.(2017). Board structure, ownershipconcentration and corporateperformance: Italian evidence.Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(1-2),347-359.
Stiles, P. and Taylor, B. (2001) Boards at work – how directors view their roles and responsibilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sudarsanam, S., & Mahate, A. A. (2003). Glamour Acquirers, Method of Payment and Post acquisition Performance: The UK Evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30, 299-342.
Sugiyono.(2013). Statistika untuk Penelitian. CV. Albeta: Bandung.
Vafeas, N. and Theodorou, E. (1998) The relationship between board structure and firm performance in the UK. British Accounting Review 30, 383–407.
Yawson, A. (2006) Evaluating the characteristics of corporate boards associated with layoff decisions. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14(2), 75–84.
Yermack, D. (1996) Higher market valuations of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40, 185–211.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29264/jimm.v5i3.5416
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Mulawarman (JIMM)
Editorial Address
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Mulawarman (JIMM)
Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University
Jl. Tanah Grogot No.1 Samarinda Kalimantan Timur 75119
Email: jimm.feb@gmail.com