Email this article Pengaruh grup afiliasi dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kinerja perusahaan melalui debt to equity ratio pada perusahaan sektor industri dasar dan kimia di bursa efek indonesia
Abstract
Peneltian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pengaruh grup afiliasi, ukuran perusahaan terhadap DER dan kinerja. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada perusahaan sektor industri dasar dan kimia yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2012-2016. Sampel penelitian 58 perusahaan sektor industri dasar dan kimia yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2012-2016. Metode pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan purposive sampling. Teknik analisis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan Statistik Deskriptif dan Analisis Jalur. Hasil analisis menunjukkan grup afiliasi berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap DER, ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap DER, grup afiliasi berpengaruh negatif namun tidak signifikan terhadap kinerja, ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kinerja dan DER berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja.
Keywords
References
Aguiar, M., Bailey, C., Bhattacharya, A., Bradtke, T., Jesus, d. J., Hemerling, J., et al. (2009).The 2009 BCG Report: 100 new global challengers. How companies from rapidly developing economies are contending for global leadership. (pp.1-38). Boston, MA: The Boston Consulting Group.
Bamiatzi, V., Cavusgil, S. T., Jabbour, L., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2014). Does business
group affiliation help firms achieve superior performance during industrial downturns? An empirical examination. journal homepage, 23, 195-211.
Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 429–448.
Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. (2009). International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from india. British Journal of Management, 20, 172–186.
Ghemawat, P., & Khanna, T. (1998). The nature of diversified business groups: A research design and two case studies. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 35–61.
Granovetter, M. (1994). Business groups. In N. J. In Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology. New York: Princeton University Press.
Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 31–41.
Juanda, B., & Junaidi. ( 2012). Ekonometrika Deret Waktu. PT Penerbit IPB Press.
Bogor.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000a). The future of business groups in emerging markets:Long-run evidence from Chile. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 268– 285.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000b). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified indian business groups. The Journal of Finance, 55,
–891.
Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 45–74.
Khanna, T., & Yafeh, Y. (2007). Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites? Journal of Economic Literature, XLV, 331–372.
Kim, D., Kandemir, D., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). The role of family conglomerates in emerging markets: What western companies should know. Thunderbird
International Business Review, 46, 13–38.
Lang, L. H. P., & Stulz, R. M. (1994). Tobin’s Q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1248.
Latham, S. F., & Braun, M. R. (2008). The performance implications of financial slack during economic recession and recovery: Observations from the software industry (2001–2003). Journal of Managerial Issues, XX, 30–50.
Ma, X., Yao, X., & Xi, Y. (2006). Business group affiliation and firm performance in a transition economy: A focus on ownership voids. Asia Pacific Journal of
Management, 23, 467–483.
Markides, C., C. (1995). Diversification, restructuring and economic performance.
Journal Strategic Management, 16, 101-118.
Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2015). Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. The
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, Issue 15
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro–macro link. The Academy of Management
Journal, 43, 486–501.
Singh, M., Nejadmalayeri, A., & Mathur, I. (2007). Performance impact of business group affiliation: An analysis of the diversification-performance link in a
developing economy. Journal of Business Research, 60, 339–347.
Sudarsanam, S., & Mahate, A. A. (2003). Glamour Acquirers, Method of Payment
and Post acquisition Performance: The UK Evidence. Journal of Business
Finance & Accounting, 30, 299-342.
Sugiyono. (2013). Statistika untuk Penelitian. CV. Albeta: Bandung.
Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice. The
Journal of Finance, Volume 43, Issue 1.
Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Binks, M. (2005). Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneur behaviour and contrubions. Small Business Economics, 25, 109–132.
Whited, T. M. (2001). Is it inefficient investment that causes the diversification discount? The Journal of Finance, 56, 1667–1691.
Yiu, D., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. (2005). Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to
prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 183–206.
Yudaruddin, R. (2014). Statistik Ekonomi: Aplikasi dengan Program SPSS Versi 20.
Interpena: Yogyakarta.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29264/jimm.v5i2.5405
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Mulawarman (JIMM)
Editorial Address
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Mulawarman (JIMM)
Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University
Jl. Tanah Grogot No.1 Samarinda Kalimantan Timur 75119
Email: jimm.feb@gmail.com