PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN DAN MOTIVASI KERJA SERTA BUDAYA ORGANISASI TERHADAP KEPUASAN DAN KINERJA KERJA KARYAWAN PT PAMA PERSADA NUSANTARA KUTAI KARTANEGARA

Musdalifah Musdalifah, Dr. H. Zainal Ilmi, SE,MBA, Dr. Ariesta Heksarini, MM

Abstract


ABSTRACT

 

EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLE AND WORK MOTIVATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON EMPLOYEE AND PEREFORMANCE  SATISFACTION OF PT PAMA PERSADA  NUSANTARA

KUTAI KARTANEGARA

 

MUSDALIFAH

1501026143

 

PT Pama Persada Nusantara (PAMA) is a company engaged in the business of “Mining & Earthmoving Contractor”. Starting from the rental division of PT United Tractor Tbk until 1993 PAMA stood alone. Various coal mining projects, construction, land preparation and logging projects are PAMA’s Competencies.

The purpose oh this study was to determine and analyze the influence of leadership style and work motivation and organizational culture on the performance and job satisfaction of PT Pama Persada Nusantara Kutai Kartanegara.

This research was conducted in the Plan 2 PT Pama Persada Nusantara as many as 78 people. Data collection is done using a questionnaire. The analysis method used is Partial Least Square (PLS). The results of the study indicate that leadership style provides a positive and insignificant relationship to employee satisfaction, leadership style provides a positive and not significant relationship to employee performance, while work motivation has a positive and significant influence on employee satisfaction, work motivation has a positive and not significant effect on employee performance, organizational culture has a positive and significant influence on employee satisfaction, organizational culture has a positive and insignificant influence on employee performance then satisfaction has a positive and significant influence on employee performance.

The phenomenon or variation of satisfaction is explained by the variables of leadership style, work motivation and organizational culture by 67.50 percent (0.675 x 100%) while the rest is explained by the variation of other variables outside of the research model by 32.50 (100%-67.50%). While the performance is explained by the variables of leadership style, work motivation and organizational culture and satisfaction of 59.70 percent (0.597 x 100%) while the rest is explained by the variation of other variables outside of the research model of 40.30 (100%-59.70%).


Keywords


Keywords : Leadership Style, Motivation, Performance, Organization, Culture.

References


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Alberto .2005. Noise Control A Primer. Califormia USA : Singular Publishing Droup.

Dessler, Gary. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (terjemahan) Edisi 14. Salemba Empat.

Dessler, Gary. 2003. Human Resource Management. Tenth Edition. New Jersey : Prentice Haall.

http://dominique122.blogspot.co.id/2015/04/hubungan-motivasi-kerja-terhadap.html

https://teorionline.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/hubungan-kepuasan-kerja-dengan-kinerja/

Emad. 2014. Leadership Importance in Construction Productivity Improvement. Global Advanced Research Journal of Management and Business Studies, Vol. 3, no.3, pp: 114-125.

Luthans Fred. 2005. Organization Behavior 10th Edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Gibson. 2000. Prilaku Organisasi. Airlangga. Jakarta.

Goleman Daniel. 2003. Kepemimpinan yang Mendatangkan Hasil. Jogjayarta.Cetakan Pertama Amara Books,

Hariandja Marihot Tua Efendi. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta. Grameda Widiasarana Indonesia.

Hasibuan, M. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta. Bumi Akasara.

Herdiansyah,Haris. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Hermansyah, H.2009. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Seni dalam Memahami Fenomena Social.Yogyakarta: Greentea Publishing.

Heidjrachman dan Saud Husnan. 2002. Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta BPFE.

Kasali, Rhenald. 2006. Change, tak Peduli Berapa Jauh Jalan salah yang Anda Jalani, Putar Arah Sekarang Juga (Manajemen Perubahan dan Harapan). Jakarta. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2009. Corporate Culture and Performance. Jakarta PT Prenhalindo

Kirl L. Rongga.2001. Human Resources Pracities, Organizational Climate and Employee Satisfaction. Academy of Management Review. July 619-644.

Luthans, Fred. 1997. Organization Behavior. Trird Edition. New York : Mc Graw Hill Companies. Inc

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung

Minavand, et.all. 2013. The Impact of Project Managers’ Leadership Style on Eemployees’ Job Satisfaction, Performance and Turnover. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp: 43-49.

Muchlas, Makmuri.2005. Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Moslow, Abraham. 1994. Motivasi dan Kepribadian-Tiori Motivasi dengan Pendekatan Hierarki Kebutuhan Manusia, Jakarta : LPPM.

Nurhayati, Ma’num dan Bisma Dewabrata. 1995. Identifikasi nilai-nilai Budaya Kerja dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Sikap Kerja Studi Kasus Direktorat Produksi PT. IPTN. Proceeding Forum Komunikasi Penelitian Manajemen di Indonesia.

Notoatmodjo. 2009. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Ostroff, Cheri. 1992. The Relationship Between Satisfactions, Attitudes, And Performance ; An Organizational Lavel Analysis. Journal of Applies Psychology.

Panggabean, S. Mutiara. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.

Riani, Asri Laksmi.2011. Budaya Organisasi. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu

Rivai, Veithzal. 2008. Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Kedua Jakarta. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Robbins, Stephen P, 1979. Perilaku Organisasi, Konsep-Kontroversi-Aplikasi, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta.PT. Prenhalindo.

Robbins S, Pujaatmaka (penerj). 1996. Perilaku Organisasi. Jilid 2. Jakarta. Prenhalindo.

Robbins, Stephen P.2003. Organization Behavior. Alih Bahasa Benyamin Molan. Prentica Hall, Jakarta.New Jersey.

Robbins, Stephen P.2015. Organization Behavior 16th Edition. Person Education, Inc

Sarinadi Ni Nengah. 2014. Analisis faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Motivasi Kerja Karyawan pada UD Surya Logam Desa Temukus Tahun 2014. Singaraja. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Sekaran, Uma. 2015. Research Methods For Business. Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis. Buku 2 Edisi 4. Jakarta. Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Sekaran, Uma. 2014. Research Methods For Business. Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis. Buku 1 Edisi 4. Jakarta. Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Siagian, Sondang P.2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya manusia. Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta. PT Rinerka Cipta.

Sudarmayanti. 2000. Tata Kerja dan Produktivitas Kerja; Suatu Tinjauan dari aspek Ergonomi atau Kaitan Antar manusia dengan Lingkungan Kerjanya. Bandung. Mandar Maju

Sugiyono.2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan R D D. Bandung. Alfabeta,

Sukmasari Hentry. 2011. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Motivasi, Insentif, Lingkungan Kerja dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Pengelolaan Keuangan dan asset Daerah Kota Semarang. Universitas Semarang. Dian Nuswantoro.

Suparman. 2007. ” Analisis Pengaruh peran Kepemimpinan, Motivasi dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Pegawai”

Sutrisno, Edy.2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Kencana Prenada Media Jakarta. Grup.

Sunyoto, Danang. 2011.Riset Bisnis dengan Analisis Jalur SPSS. Penerbit Yogyakarta. Gaya media.

Umar Husen. 2005. Riset Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Organisasi. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Wibowo. 2008. Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Yuniarsih, Tjutju dan Suwatno.2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Teori, Aplikasi dan Isu Penelitian, Bandung. Alfabeta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29264/jimm.v4i2.4464

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Mulawarman (JIMM)


Crossref logo 

Editorial Address

Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Mulawarman (JIMM)
Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University
Jl. Tanah Grogot No.1 Samarinda Kalimantan Timur 75119
Email: jimm.feb@gmail.com