Comparison based on kbmi 1 on national private bank risks with conventional and sharia principles

Asrid Juniar, Rilian Gusma Wira Pradana, Rini Rahmawati, Ashari Sofyaun

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are differences in credit risk, liquidity risk, and market risk in conventional national private banks and Islamic national private banks based on KBMI 1. This study used 24 banks as a sample consisting of 21 conventional banks and 3 Islamic banks from 68 national private banks registered with the OJK which became the population through the purposive sampling method. Data using secondary data obtained from the company's annual statements published on the OJK website and on the company's official website. The data collection of this study used documentation techniques and the method used, and the method used is different test. The results in the tests that have been carried out show that there is no difference in the credit risk of conventional national private banks and Islamic national private banks based on KBMI; There is no difference in the liquidity risk of conventional national private banks and Islamic national private banks based on KBMI; There are no differences in the market risks of conventional national private banks and Islamic national private banks based on KBMI.


Keywords


Credit risk; liquidity risk; market risk; KBMI 1

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, S. F., & Malik, Q. A. (2015). Credit risk management and loan performance: Empirical investigation of micro finance banks of Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 574–579.

Al Humam, A. Y., & Sihotang, E. T. (2019). Risiko Usaha Terhadap Rasio Kecukupan Modal Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa Go Public. Journal of Business & Banking, 8(2), 255. https://doi.org/10.14414/jbb.v8i2.1639

Bintari, D. A. (2015). Analisis Komparatif Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah Berdasarakan Metode RGEC. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta.

Dahliani, Y., Istifadah, I., & Juniar, A. (2021). Study of Influence Customer Intimicy on Religous Based Brand Trust, Customer Satisfaction in Islamic Banks (Case on Danamon Sharia Bank in East Java Indonesia). The 3rd International Conference on Economics and Business.

Ekinci, A. (2016). The Effect of Credit and Market Risk on Bank Performance : Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 427–434.

Fahmi, I. (2014). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (4th ed.). Alfabeta.

Fitriana, N., Rosyid, A., & Fakhrina, A. (2015). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Syariah Dan Konvensional Dengan Menggunakan Metode Rgec ( Risk Profile , Good Corporate Governance , Earnings , Dan Capital ). Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 17(2), 1–12. https://jurnal.unikal.ac.id/index.php/jebi/article/view/332

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 H Imam Ghozali. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gunawan, R., Yusniar, M. W., & Juniar, A. (2019). Pengaruh Risiko Spekulatif, Risiko Operasional, Dan Volume Penjualan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan PT. Prima Multi Mineral. JWM (Jurnal Wawasan Manajemen), 7(2), 2013–2015.

Hanafi, M. M. (2016). Manajemen Risiko (3rd ed.). UPP STIM YKPN.

Hustilah, N., Yudi, & Hernando, R. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan RBBR pada BUS dan BUK di Indonesia Periode 2016-2020. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 3(2), 191–208.

Ikatan Bankir Indonesia. (2016). Supervisi Manajemen Risiko Bank (1st ed.). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Jikrillah, S., Ziyad, M., Stiadi, D., & Juniar, A. (2022). Sustainability Based on Risk Management of Batik Sasirangan SMEs in the Banjarmasin City. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management, Business, and Technology (ICOMBEST 2021), 194. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211117.014

Juniar, A., Rahmi, Z., Rahmawati, R., & Fadah Isti. (2020). Value at Risk in the Formation of Optimal Portfolio on Sharia-Based Stocks. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(5), 1198–1203. https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i5/E5750018520.pdf

Juniar, A., Fadah, I., Utami, E. S., & Puspitasari, N. (2021). The Effect of Risk-Based Efficiency Value on Firm Value: A Case Study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0231

Kasmir. (2018). Manajemen Perbankan Edisi Revisi (15th ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada.

Nusron, L. A., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Risiko Keuangan Bank Konvensional dengan Bank Syariah. Journal of Business and Information Systems (e- ISSN: 2685-2543), 2(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v2i1.33

OJK. Peningkatan Dana Pihak Ketiga Bank di Indonesia Berdasarkan Kelompok Bank Tahun 2018-2021.

OJK. Perbedaan Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah. www.ojk.co.id

Prasteyandari, C. W. (2016). Analisis Komparatif Risiko Pada Bank Konvensional dan Bank Syariah Di Indonesia. In Skripsi (Dipublikasikan). Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jember.

Ramlan, S. R., Moniharapon, S., & Tulung, J. E. (2018). Analisis Perbandingan Risiko Kredit antara Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional. Jurnal EMBA, 6(1), 151–160.

Saiful, & Ayu, D. P. (2019). Risks Management and Bank Performance : The Empirical Evidences from Indonesian Conventional and Islamic Banks. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(4), 90–94.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/jinv.v19i2.13207

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Asrid Juniar, Rilian Gusma Wira Pradana, Rini Rahmawati, Ashari Sofyaun

Crossref logo 

Editorial Address

INOVASI: Jurnal ekonomi, keuangan dan manajemen
Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University
Jl. Tanah Grogot No.1 Samarinda Kalimantan Timur 75119
Email: jakt.feb.unmul@gmail.com

StatCounter: INOVASI: Jurnal ekonomi, keuangan dan manajemen