Email this article Mencapai keunggulan bersaing melalui pendekatan quadraple helix pada industri kreatif sektor fashion di bogor
Abstract
Artikel ini membahas hubungan antara quadruple helix, inovasi dan daya saing. Sebuah model diusulkan dan diuji menggunakan sampel 200 pengusaha sektor fashion di Bogor. Data dianalisis melalui penggunaan pemodelan persamaan struktural (SEM). Temuan ini mengkonfirmasi bahwa strategi quadruple helix dapat mendukung inovasi dan daya saing. Kolaborasi dari empat pilar ini (pemerintah, bisnis, akademisi dan masyarakat sipil) dapat menjadi pusat penyelidikan, konsultasi, sosialisasi, pengembangan berbagai aspek mulai dari teknologi dan pemasaran produk
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., and Piirainen, T. (2010).Exploring Quadruple Helix Outlining user-oriented innovation models.Final Report on Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ project, under the Interreg IVC Programme.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1) pp 99-120.
Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Quadruple innovation helix and smart specialization: knowledge production and national competitiveness. 10.
Carayannis, E. G., and Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). Mode 3 and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3), 201-234.
Carayannis, E. G., and Campbell, D. F. J. (2010).Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a transdisciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 2010, 1(1):41–69.
Carayannis, E. G., and Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production 1 in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems.
Carayannis, E. G., and Rakhmatullin, R. (2014).The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, DOI 10.1007/s13132-014-0185-8 Springer Science and Business Media, New York, 2014.
Dewi, E. M. (2009). Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Triple Helix sebagai Upaya pengembangan industry kreatif. Seminar Nasional’ Peran pendidikan kejuruan dalam pengembangan ekonomi kreatif.
Departemen Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2009). Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia 2015: Rencana Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia 2009 - 2015. Departemen Perdagangan RI.
Djamil, A., Savitri, L., dan Retno. B. (2012). Faktor-faktor Wirausaha Sukses Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Program Magister Manajemen – Universitas Islam Jakarta, Volume 4, Nomor 2, 2012.
Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., and Cantisan, T. B. R. (2000).The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, Volume 29, Issue 2, February 2000, Pages 313–330.
Etzkowitz, H., dan Dizisah, J. (2008). Triple Helix Circulation: The heart of innovation and development. International Journalof Tecnology Management and sustainable development.
Edquist, C., And McKelvey, M. (Eds). (2000). System of Innovation: Growth, Competitiveness and Employment. An Elgar Reference Collection (twovolumes), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Esti, R dan Suryani. (2008). Potret Industri Kreatif Indonesia. Economic Review, Nomor 212, Jakarta.
Executive Summary. (2006). Hasil Kajian Deputi Bidang Sumber Daya Manusia UKM dan Koperasi (http://www.smeeda.com)
Fernando, C. S. R., Pellissier & Monteiro, I, P. (2012). Creativity, Inovation and Collaborative Organization. Interantional Journal of Organization Innovation.
Halim, A. (2011). The Measurement of Entrepreneurial Personality and Business Performance in Terengganu Creative Industry. International Journal of Business Management.
Istanto, Y. (2010). Pengaruh strategi Kenggulan Bersaing & Positioning Terhadap Kinerja (Survey pada Koperasi Serba Usaha di Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta). Buletin Ekonomi Vol 8, No 2.Yogyakarta.
Kapoor, A., & Chinaya, K. (2012). Branding and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Management Development Instititute of India.
Kerlinger, F.N., and Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundation of Behavioral Research. 4th ed. Orlando: Harcourt, Inc.
Kuncoro, M. (2009). Sektor Riil dan UMKM Pasca Inpres No.6/2007, www.mudrajad.com.
Leifer, et al., (2000). Redical Innovation: Hor Matur Companies Can Out smart Upstarts. Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
Monteiro, A. O., &Thomson, M. (2012). A Growth Modelfor the Quadruple Helix Innovation Theory. Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 13.
Morgan, N. A. (2012). Marketing and Business Performance. Journal of The Academy of Marketing, 58 : 20-38.
Najib, M., (2006). Peningkatan Kinerja Bisnis Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM) dengan Pengembangan Orientasi Pasar. Jurnal Manajemen Publikasi Penelitian dan Review, Vol 1, No 2, November.
Nursya’bani, P., & Setiawan, H. (2003). Analisis Pengaruh sumber-sumber keunggulan bagi Pemasaran terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Manufactur di Indonesia. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, UII, Vol 2,.
Oscar. A., Monterino, S., & Thomshon, M. (2010). A Growth Model for the Quadruple Helix Innovation Theory. Journal of Business Economics & Management.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive Advantage Creating & Sustaining Superior Performance, New York.
Praswati, A. N. (2017). Perkembangan model Helix dalam peningkatan Inovasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Manajemen & Bisnis.
Savitri, L., Retno,B., Widysatuti, Sri., (2014). The study of women entrepreneurs of Minangkabau and Betawiethnicsin Jakarta. The 11th International Research Conference on Quality, Innovation and Knowledge Management (QIK2014), Conference Proceedings (QIK)19th – 21 th February 2014 – Bandung Indonesia
Savitri, L., dan Soebagyo. (2018). Peran Qudruple Helix Networks terhadap Inovasi pada Industri Kreatif di Bogor.Prosiding Seminar Nasional Forum Manajemen Indonesia ke 10.
Wolpert, J. D. (2002). Breaking Out of theInnovation Box. Harvard Business Review, August: 2002, p.78
Yawson, R. M. (2009). The Ecological System of Innovation: A New Architectural Framework for a Functional Evidence-Based Platform for Science and Innovation Policy.The Future of Innovation Proceedings of the XXIV ISPIM 2009 Conference, Vienna, Austria, June 21–24, 2009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v21i1.5224
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Laili Savitri Noor, Deriawan Deriawan, Tia Ichwani
Editorial Address
FORUM EKONOMI: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi
Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University
Jl. Tanah Grogot No.1 Samarinda Kalimantan Timur 75119
Email: jakt.feb.unmul@gmail.com
StatCounter: FORUM EKONOMI: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi