The influence of cyberloafing to generation z’s productivity: looking at role of creativity as mediating factor
Abstract
In today's digital era, students are very close to the internet. Today's students are students of the z generation, students who are not free from the internet. They access the internet using gadgets that they can carry anywhere and can access the internet wherever they want, this results in cyberloafing. Cyberloafing is the behavior of using the internet in a learning environment for personal interests that are not related to assignments at school. This can affect the productivity and creativity of students, so this study was conducted with the aim to examine the effect of cyberloafing on productivity, cyberloafing on creativity and creativity on productivity. This type of research is a type of quantitative research using statistical calculations with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis methods. Using a purposive sampling method, by looking for respondents who meet criteria such as students with a generation of z and also open gadgets to open things that have nothing to do with learning during lecture hours. The results of this study state that cyberloafing has a significant effect on productivity with a probability value of 0.009 <0.05, then cyberloafing has a significant effect on creativity with a probability value of 0.026 <0.05, then creativity also has a significant effect on productivity with its probability value as big as *** or the value is less than 0.001 <0.05 and in this study also gets the results that creativity can mediate the influence of cyberloafing on productivity in student generation z with a coefficient of 0.027. Based on the results of these studies it can be concluded that there is a significant influence between cyberloafing on productivity, cyberloafing on creativity and creativity on productivity and creativity can mediate the influence of cyberloafing on productivity in student generation z.
Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbasin. (2018). Organizational Information Security: Strategies to Minimize Workplace Cyberloafing for Increased Productivity. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, 1-133.
Anizizo. (2017). Role of Middle Managers in Mitigating Employee Cyberloafing in the Workplace. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, 1-232.
Bencsik, Csikos, & Juhez. (2016). Y and Z Generations at Workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 90-106.
Blau, Yang, & Ward-Cook. (2004). Testing a measure of cyberloafing. Journal of Allied Health, 9-17.
Bock, & Ho. (2009). Non-work related computing (NWRC). Communications of the ACM, 124-128.
Bryson. (2006). Managing Information Services: A Transformational Approach. USA: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Doorn. (2011, Agustus). Cyberloafing: A multi-dimensional construct placed in a theoretical framework. Dipetik Juli 28, 2018, dari Department Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences. Series Master Theses Innovation Management: https://www.innovatiefinwerk.nl/sites/innovatiefinwerk.nl/files/field/bijlage/cyberloafing_a_multi-dimensional_construct_placed_in_a_theoretical_framework_-_odin_van_doorn_0547224.pdf
Elizabeth. (2015). Raising Children in Digital Era. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Garret, & Danziger. (2008). Disaffection or expected outcomes: understanding personal internet use during work. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 937-958.
Geokcearslan, Mumcu, Haslaman, & Cevik. (2016). Modelling smartphone addiction: The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university. Computers in Human Behavior, 639-649.
Hair. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edition: New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hasibuan. (2009). Manajemen Dasar, Pengertian, Dan Masalah. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Hellen. (2012). Cyber Smart Parenting. Bandung: PT. Visi Anugerah Indonesia.
Henle, & Blanchard. (2008). The Interaction of Work Stressors and Organizational Sanctions on Cyberloafing. Journal of Managerial Issues, 383-400.
Henle, & Blanchard. (2008). Correlates of different forms of Cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behaviour, 1067-1084.
Henle, & Kedharnath. (2012). Cyberloafing in the workplace. In Z. Yan. Encyclopedia of Research on Cyber Behaviour, 560-573.
Herdiati. (2015). Pengaruh Stresor Kerja dan Persepsi Sanksi Organisasi terhadap Perilaku Cyberloafing.Jemb. Jurnal Pustaka Kesehatan, 1.
Hinduan, Agia, & Kholiq. (2018, Februari 14). Pengelolaan Pembelajaran Generasi Z. Dipetik Juli 8, 2018, dari https://www.researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323259147_PENGELOLAAN_PEMBELAJARAN_GENERASI_Z
Holguin. (2016). Strategies Functional Managers Use to Control Cyberloafing Behaviors. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, 1-129.
James, & Robert. (2006). The International Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jandaghi, Alvani, Matin, & Kozekanan. (2015). Cyberloafing Management in Organizations. Iranian Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 335-349.
Johnson, & Ugray. (2007). Dimensions of Online Behavior: Toward a User Typology. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 773-779.
Kay, Bart, Johnson, Chern, & Kangas. (2009). Cyberloafing: a modern workplace phenomenon. Http//www.alancherm.com.
Kelloway. (1998). Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling- A Researcher’s Guide. California: Sage Publications. Inc., Thousand Oaks.
Khera, & Malik. (2014). Life Priorities and Work Preferences of Generation Y: An Exploratory Analysis in India Context. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 63-76.
Kim. (2014, Agustus 4). Attention, Bosses: Web-Surfing at Work Has Its Benefits. Dipetik September 5, 2018, dari www.uc.edu: https://www.uc.edu/news/articles/legacy/enews/2014/08/e20164.html
Kueng. (2017). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan Dan Kreativitas Terhadap Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Kontrak Di Sekretariat Kabupaten Mahakam Ulu. eJournal Pemerintahan Integratif, 51-69.
Lavoive, & Pychyl. (2001, November). Cyberslacking and the Procrastination Superhighway: A Web-Based Survey of Online Procrastination, Attitudes, and Emotion. Dipetik Juli 8, 2018, dari https://www.researchgate.net: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249737100_Cyberslacking_and_the_Procrastination_Superhighway_A_Web-Based_Survey_of_Online_Procrastination_Attitudes_and_Emotion
Liberman, Gwendolyn, Katelyn, & Laura. (2011). Employee job attitudes and organizational characteristics as predictors of cyberloafing. Computers in Human Behavior, 2192-2199.
Lim. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 675-694.
Lim, Vivien K.G & Chen. (2012). Cyberloafing at the Workplace: Gain or Drain on work? Behavior and Information Technology. Journal Behavior and Information Technology, 31 (4)
Lim, & Teo. (2005). Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: An exploratory study. Journal of Information and Management, 1081-1093.
Manullang, & Andreas. (1993). Manajemen Partisipatif. Jakarta: Pusat Produktivitas Nasional.
Muis. (2001). Indonesia di Era Dunia Maya Teknologi Informasi dalam Dunia Tanpa Batas. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Munandar. (2004). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Nisaurrahmadani. (2016, Mei 14). Hubungan stress kerja dengan perilaku cyberloafing pada karyawan administrasi. Dipetik September 5, 2018, dari UMM Institutional Repository: http://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/30021
Ozler, & Polat. (2012). Cyberloafing phenomenon in organizations: Determinants and impacts. International Journal of e-Bussiness and eGovernment Studies, 1-15.
Padmanaba. (2006). Pengaruh Penerangan Dalam Ruang Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Mahasiswa Desain Interior. Dimensi Interior, 57-63.
Philips, & Reddie. (2007). Decisional style and self-reported email use in the workplace. Computer in Human Behavior, 2414-2428.
Putra. (2016). Theoretical Review: Teori Perbedaan Generasi. Among Makarti, 123-134.
Ragan, Jennings, Massey, & Doolittle. (2014). Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes. Computers & Education, 78-86.
Reilly, & Peter. (2012). Understanding and Teaching Generation Y. English Teaching Forum, 2-11.
Robbins, & Judge. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Rustandi. (2017). Penerapan Media Interaktif Mata Pelajaran Pemeliharaan Sistem Electronic Fuel Injection (Efi) Pada Siswa Smk Swasta Di Garut: Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (Ptk) Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Di SMK Al Farisi Leles Garut Kelas XI TKR 1 Repository UPI Central Library. Dipetik september 5, 2018, dari http://repository.upi.edu/30635/
Sedarmayanti. (1996). Tata Kerja dan Produktivitas Kerja, Suatu Tinjauan Aspek Ergonomi atau Kaitan antara Manusia dengan Lingkungan Kerja. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Sedarmayanti. (2001). Sumber Daya Manusia Dan Produktifitas Kerja. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Smith. (2015, April 1). Pew Research Center. Dipetik Mei 18, 2017, dari www.pewinternet.org: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kunatitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutrisno. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.
Ugrin, Odom, & Pearson. (2007). Profiling Cyber-Slackers in the Workplace: Demographic, Cultural and Workplace Factors. Journal of Internet Commerce, 75-89.
Ugrin, Odom, & Pearson. (2008). Cyber-slacking: Self-control, prior behavior and the impact of deterrence measures. Review of Business Information Systems, 75-87.
Vitak, Crouse, & LaRose. (2011). Personal Internet use at work: Understanding cyberslacking. Computers in Human Behavior, 1751-1759.
Weatherbee. (2010). Counterproductive use of technology at work: Information and communications technologies and cyber deviancy. Human Resource Management Review, 35-44.
Whitty, & Carr. (2006). New Rules in The Workplace: Applying object relations theory to explain problem Internet and email behavior in the workplace. Computer in Human Behavior, 235-250.
Zamroni. (2009). Filsafat Komunikasi: Pengantar Ontologis, Epistomologis, Aksiologis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Zuliawati. (2016). Pengaruh Kreativitas dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Produktivitas Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam Sekolah Dasar Sekecamatan Baturetno Kabupaten Wonogiri. Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam, 23-38.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/jkin.v18i1.8395
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Handi Wijaya Hartanto, Rosaly Franksiska
Editorial Address
Kinerja: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen
Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University
Jl. Tanah Grogot No.1 Samarinda Kalimantan Timur 75119
Email: jkin.feb.unmul@gmail.com
StatCounter: Kinerja