Email this article Pengaruh Board Independence Dan State Ownership Terhadap Firm Performance Pada Perusahaan Sektor Property, Real Estate, And Building Construction Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia
Abstract
ABSTRAK
                Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh board independence dan state ownership terhadap firm performance. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada perusahaan sektor property, real estate, and building construction yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2014-2017. Penelitian ini menggunakan purposive sampling dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 49 perusahaan. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data kuantitatif dan sumber data diambil dari laporan keuangan tahunan perusahaan. Statistik deskriptif dan regresi data panel digunakan sebagai alat analisis data. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa board independence berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan, state ownership berpengaruh negatif namun tidak signifikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan, dan interaksi antara board independence dan state ownership berpengaruh positif namun tidak signifikan terhadap kinerja perusahaan.
Kata Kunci : Board Independence, State Ownership, dan Firm Performance.
ABSTRACT
                This study aimed to analyze the effect of board independence and state ownership on firm performance. This research was conducted on property, real estate, and building construction sector firm listed on Indonesia stock Exchange in 2014 to 2017 period. This study utilitized a purposive sampling with a total sample of 49 firms. The type of data was a quantitative data and data source was gained from annual financial statements firm. Descriptive statistic and data regression was used as data analysis instruments. The result of this study indicated that board independence had a positive significant effect on firm performance, state ownership had a negative but not significant effect on firm performance, and interaction between board independence and state owner had a positive but not significant effect on firm performance.
Keywords : Board independence, State Ownership, and firm performance.
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Alexander, H. B. (2017). sektor kontruksi penyumbang ketiga pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional Kompas.com. Retrieved from http://properti.kompas.com/read/2017/02/10/220000321/sektor.kontruksi.penyumbang.ketiga.pertumbuhan.ekonomi.nasional
Anggraeni, R. (2019). Laba Meningkat , Tiga BUMN Konstruksi Buktikan Kinerja Positif. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/amp/s/ekbis.sindonews.com
Berghe, V. den, & Baelden, T. (2005). The complex relation between director independence and board effectiveness. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510630068
Boone, A. L., Karpoff, J. M., & Raheja, C. G. (2004). The Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Composition : An Empirical Analysis.
Chizema, T. le & A. (2011). State Ownership, Institutional Ownership and Relationship with Firm Performance : Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms, 2(2), 72–90.
Cornett, M. M., Guo, L., Khaksari, S., & Tehranian, H. (2009). The impact of state ownership on performance differences in privately-owned versus state-owned banks: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2008.09.005
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16. no.1(June 1991), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory : An Assessment and Review Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : Agency Theory : An Assessment and Review, 14(1), 57–74.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation Of Ownership And Control. East, 26(2), 301–325.
Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board Independence and Firm Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37(16), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30152-6
Gani, L., & Jermias, J. (2006). Investigating the effect of board independence on performance across different strategies. International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2006.07.009
Gutierrez, C. L., Begona, Olmo, T., & Sanfilippo Azofra, S. (2012). Firms’ performance under different bankruptcy systems: a Europe-USA empirical analysis. Accounting and Finance, 52(3), 849–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00407.x
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance : Integrating agency and performance. Review Literature And Arts Of The Americas, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.10196729
Horne, J. C. Van, & Wachowicz, J. M. (2008). Financial Management (13th ed.). england.
Jensen, M. C. (1993). American Finance Association The Modern Industrial Revolution , Exit , and the Failure of Internal Control Systems President of the American Finance Association, 48(3).
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of firm : Managerial behaviour, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R. (2011). The Supply of Corporate Directors and Board Independence ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1904730%5Cnhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1904730%5Cnhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1904730
Kobeissi, N., & Sun, X. (2010). Ownership structure and bank performance: Evidence from the middle East and North Africa region. Comparative Economic Studies, 52(3), 287–323. https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2010.10
Lee, J. (2009). Does size matter in firm performance? Evidence from US public firms. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 16(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571510902917400
Liu, Y., Miletkov, M. K., Wei, Z., & Yang, T. (2014). Board independence and firm performance in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.004
Malatesta, P. H., & DeWenter, K. L. (2001). State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity. American Economic Review, 91(1), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.320
Mrad, M., & Hallara, S. (2012). The Impact of Residual Government Ownership on Performance and Value Creation: the Case of Privatized French Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62(October 2012), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.078
Ponnu, C. H. (2008). Corporate Governance Structures and the Performance of Malaysian Public Listed Companies, 4(January), 217–230.
Salim, M., & Yadav, R. (2012). Capital Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Listed Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(August), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.105
Scafarto, V., Ricci, F., Corte, G. Della, & Luca, P. De. (2017). Board Structure, Ownership Concentration And Corporate Performance: Italian Evidence. Food Manufacture, 15(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i1c2p4
Sun, Q., & Tong, W. H. S. (2003). China share issue privatization: The extent of its success. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(2), 183–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00145-4
Tian, L., & Estrin, S. (2007). Retained state shareholding in Chinese PLCs: Does government ownership always reduce corporate value? Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.10.003
Wang, W. (2014). Independent Directors and Corporate Performance in China: A Meta-Empirical Study. Ssrn, II(3). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2417078
Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the Dynamics of Corporate Governance. SSRN ELibrary, (785). https://doi.org/DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors, 40, 185–211.
Yiu, D., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. (2005). Understanding Business Group Performance in an Emerging Economy: Acquiring Resources and Capabilities in Order to Prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 183–206.
Yudaruddin, R. (2014). Statistik Ekonomi, Aplikasi dengan Program SPSS Versi 20. Yogyakarta: Interpena.
Zabri, S. M., Ahmad, K., & Wah, K. K. (2016). Corporate Governance Practices and Firm Performance: Evidence from Top 100 Public Listed Companies in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35(October 2015), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00036-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29264/jimm.v5i4.6737
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Mulawarman (JIMM)
Editorial Address
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Mulawarman (JIMM)
Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University
Jl. Tanah Grogot No.1 Samarinda Kalimantan Timur 75119
Email: jimm.feb@gmail.com